About a year ago I was poking around the Fielding Bible Volume Three and I came
across an interesting chapter. It was
about a stat they called Total Runs.
Basically it combines hitting, fielding, base running contributions and
one positional adjustment. I have since
added other things to it but we’ll get to that later. I created a little mini introduction to it on
a Microsoft Word document and here is my original take on it.
Total Runs First Thoughts
A baseball player
isn’t just a hitter, or a fielder, or even a base runner.
He's all of these
things. How can we measure this is in a run form.
Run Form?
What I mean by run
form is that it is in the form of runs and not Wins like WAR attempts to do.
Formula?
The formula for this
metric is
Runs Created+
Defensive Runs Saved+ Base running Runs+ Positional Adjustment
For the Positional Adjustment we use the following method.
Catcher:42 runs
First Base:13 runs
Second Base:32 runs
Shortstop:36 runs
Third Base:25 runs
Left Field:19 runs
Center Field:29 runs
Right Field:20 runs
DH:-7 runs
Now let's see some of the more interesting results, from 2012 stats,
For the Positional Adjustment we use the following method.
Catcher:42 runs
First Base:13 runs
Second Base:32 runs
Shortstop:36 runs
Third Base:25 runs
Left Field:19 runs
Center Field:29 runs
Right Field:20 runs
DH:-7 runs
Now let's see some of the more interesting results, from 2012 stats,
Results
Based
on 2012 stats, we see the following.
Darwin Barney is an interesting case. Barney's worth to his team in the form of Total Runs went like this.
Barney Runs Created:60
Barney DRS:28
Barney Base running runs:4.3
Barney Positional Adjustment:32 runs
Barney Total Runs: 124.3
This is actually quite a high total, mainly because of his defensive contributions. You will be shocked to know what I figured next though.
Miguel Cabrera on 2012 stats is an interesting case also.
Cabrera RC:123
Cabrera DRS:-4
Cabrera BsR:-2.9
Cabrera Positional Adjustment:141.1 runs
The Total Runs separating them? 16.8 runs...
Barney is an extreme under rated based on this metric, or is it saying Cabrera is overrated? No matter the reason, I think this stat is a very good one.
Darwin Barney is an interesting case. Barney's worth to his team in the form of Total Runs went like this.
Barney Runs Created:60
Barney DRS:28
Barney Base running runs:4.3
Barney Positional Adjustment:32 runs
Barney Total Runs: 124.3
This is actually quite a high total, mainly because of his defensive contributions. You will be shocked to know what I figured next though.
Miguel Cabrera on 2012 stats is an interesting case also.
Cabrera RC:123
Cabrera DRS:-4
Cabrera BsR:-2.9
Cabrera Positional Adjustment:141.1 runs
The Total Runs separating them? 16.8 runs...
Barney is an extreme under rated based on this metric, or is it saying Cabrera is overrated? No matter the reason, I think this stat is a very good one.
Conclusion:
It
seems to be a decent metric, perhaps rating Barney rather high and Cabrera
rather low but I like what the metric contains to it.
Back
to July 2014 now, you can Darwin Barney is actually not really that good. His current OPS+ for his career is 69 (100 is
average) and Miguel Cabrera is pretty good.
After
my first thoughts had been typed out on Total Runs, I must admit the metric was
just one I liked and used a bit. Since
then I have expanded to Park Factors.
Park Factors are very, very, important.
A player that plays at Coors Field should be penalized because if you do
poorly there you are likely a pretty bad hitter. Meanwhile, a player that plays at Petco
should be given some extra runs because some of his outs would be gone in most
other parks. Here are 2013’s park
factors.
Total Runs, 2013 Park Factors
Average Park: 100
Hitter’s Park: Above 100
Pitcher’s Park: Below 100
Chase Field: 99
Turner Field: 100
Camden Yards: 100
Fenway Park: 101
Wrigley Field: 109
U.S. Cellular Field: 97
Great American Ballpark: 97
Progressive Field: 98
Coors Field: 110
Comerica Park: 107
Minute Maid Park: 98
Kauffman Stadium: 103
Angel Stadium of Anaheim: 100
Dodger Stadium: 98
Marlins Park: 101
Miller Park: 107
Target Field: 102
Citi Field: 89
Yankee Stadium: 106
O.co Coliseum: 96
Citizens Bank Park: 97
PNC Park: 99
PETCO Park: 90
AT&T Park: 96
Safeco Field: 99
Busch Stadium: 96
Tropicana Field: 95
Rangers Ball Park in Arlington: 102
Rodgers Centre: 101
Nationals Park: 109
So
for example let’s say Player A put’s up 67 Total Runs with Coors Field being
his home park. Since Coors is 10 above
100 (100 being average) you would subtract ten from his score of 67 to make it
57 Total Runs. I feel the Park Factors
adjustment is necessary for the metric to be fair and be as accurate as
possible.
Then
about a month ago I realized that an adjustment needed to be made to compare
players from historical seasons. League
run environment adjustments. Some
leagues such as 1968 or 2004 are so heavily skewed in one’s favor that they
need to be adjusted for it to be fair and level. So to fix the issue I created a chart,
roughly to make a minor adjustment for this.
Here it is below
I
constructed a chart to push up or push down Total Run numbers based on league
run environments. Of course the higher
the RPG numbers, the lower Total Runs score they receive because it was easier
to hit in.
Runs
Per Game
4.00-4.15:
+7 Total Runs
4.15-4.22:
+3 Total Runs
4.23-4.30:
+0 Total Runs
4.30-4.40:
-4 Total Runs
4.40-4.50:
-7 Total Runs
4.50-5.00:
-12 Total Runs
NOTE:
For leagues that are so heavily skewed I mean like 3.48 Runs per Game then I
make bigger adjustments. They are not
shown on this chart.
Ok,
now that is the final thing I have added to Total Runs. The results of this are most fun of course,
comparing players and such. I wanted to
introduce the stat first though so I didn’t just show you numbers and you
having no idea what they mean or how I got them. In the next post we will compare some players
using Total Runs, such as Barry Bonds, Nap Lajoie, and more from a lot of
eras. I would also like to thank the
owner of this website for giving me a chance to write articles on this pretty
good looking blog. I understand this can
be a dull read but promise next few will be better. Thanks for reading.
Follow
me on Twitter @CastroRizzo for a lot more baseball.
No comments:
Post a Comment